- Features
- Pricing
- Migration
- Integrations
- Resources
With over 335+ pre-built integrations and flexible APIs, you can easily centralize data from across your tech stack
Make the most out of your data and unlock powerful growth marketing possibilities with these other top marketing tools.
Build any custom integration with our open, flexible APIs that are simple to use and implement.
Check out apps that have been stealing all the spotlight.
Email and SMS marketing insights, ecommerce resources, and the latest Omnisend news
Expert-led sessions covering email, SMS, and ecommerce marketing strategies.
Latest feature releases, product improvements, and bug fixes.
Find out if your A/B test has a clear winner. Enter the visitors (or email recipients) and conversions for version A and version B, and a two-proportion z-test will show whether the difference is statistically significant.
A two-sided test accounts for the possibility that your variant could have a negative impact on your result.
The level of confidence you can have that your results are not due to random chance.
Version B converted 26.7% better than A. You can be 95% confident this difference isn’t due to chance.
+26.7%
P-value shows the exact probability that the outcome of your A/B test is a result of chance.
0.0273
+0.09 to +1.51 pp
Statistical significance in A/B testing tells you whether the difference between version A and version B is bigger than you’d expect from random chance alone. A significant result means the gap is unlikely to be a fluke, so you can roll out the winner with more confidence. The smaller the p-value, the stronger the evidence that one version performs better.
Add the number of visitors (or email recipients) and conversions for each version. You’ll find these in your email or website analytics.
Pick your hypothesis (one-sided or two-sided test) and a confidence level: 90%, 95%, or 99%. Most tests use a two-sided test at 95%.
You’ll see if the difference is statistically significant, plus the relative uplift, p-value, and confidence interval. If not, keep the test running or try a bigger audience next time.
B beat A, and the p-value is below your threshold.Next step: roll out version B, then move on to your next test.
B did worse than A, and the p-value is below your threshold.Next step:keep version A and note what didn’t work, so you don’t test it again.
There’s a difference, but the p-value is above your threshold and you haven’t reached your planned sample size.Next step: keep the test running until you do.
Say you test two subject lines and send each one to 5,000 subscribers. Since Apple Mail Privacy Protection inflates open rates, you measure clicks instead. Version A gets 150 clicks (a 3.0% click rate), and version B gets 190 (3.8%). That’s a 26.7% relative uplift with a p-value of 0.0273, which is significant at 95% confidence but not at 99%. You can send version B to the rest of your list with reasonable confidence.
| Version | Recipients | Clicks | Click rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 5,000 | 150 | 3.0% |
| B | 5,000 | 190 | 3.8% |
| Result | +26.7% uplift · p = 0.0273 · significant at 95%, not at 99% | ||
With a smaller list (fewer than 5,000 subscribers per version), test bigger changes, like the offer, format, or send time, instead of small wording tweaks. Bigger changes are easier to detect with fewer subscribers per version.
The calculator compares the two conversion rates with a two-proportion z-test.
The p-value is the chance of seeing a difference at least this large if both versions performed the same. If it’s below 0.05 at 95% confidence (or 0.10 at 90%, 0.01 at 99%), the result is statistically significant.
Test subject lines, email content, and forms, then check which version won without doing the math yourself.
Divide conversions by visitors for each version, then run a two-proportion z-test on the two rates. The test returns a p-value, which is the chance of seeing a difference at least this large if both versions performed the same. If the p-value is below 0.05, the result is significant at 95% confidence.
It depends on your baseline conversion rate and the smallest uplift you want to detect. At a 3% click rate, spotting a 20% relative uplift at 95% confidence and 80% power (an 80% chance of catching the uplift if it’s real) takes about 13,900 recipients per version. Smaller uplifts need bigger samples.
For website tests, run it until each version reaches the sample size you planned, and cover full weeks so weekday and weekend behavior are both included. For email tests, the sample is fixed once you send, so wait at least 24 hours before you read the results. That way, late opens and clicks are counted.
Most tests use 95%. Go with 90% for low-risk tests where a faster answer matters more than certainty, and 99% for high-stakes changes like pricing or checkout. The higher the confidence level, the bigger the sample you need to reach significance.
A one-sided test only checks whether B is better than A. A two-sided test checks for a difference in either direction, so it also tells you when B performs worse. Two-sided is more conservative, while one-sided reaches significance with less data.
Usually, the sample is too small for the size of the difference, or the two versions really do perform about the same. If your list or traffic is small, test a bigger change, such as a different offer or email format, so the difference is easier to detect.
No. Results swing a lot early in a test. Checking results again and again (known as peeking) and stopping at the first significant reading makes a false winner much more likely. Set your sample size before you start, and read the result once you reach it.
Start with the changes most likely to move results: subject lines, the offer or discount, the main call to action, send time, and email layout. Test one change at a time so you know what caused the difference, and check the sample size you need first.
Built on feedback from 150,000+ brands. Try Omnisend and see why they stay.